0

When trying to compile the following MWE using pdflatex:

\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
 Test Test
\end{document}

I get the following error message:

jbroedel@t450s:~/Dropbox/LatexTest$ pdflatex test.tex 
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.21 (TeX Live 2020/Debian) (preloaded format=pdflatex)
 restricted \write18 enabled.
entering extended mode
(./test.tex
LaTeX2e <2020-02-02> patch level 5
L3 programming layer <2020-06-18>
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/article.cls
Document Class: article 2019/12/20 v1.4l Standard LaTeX document class
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/size10.clo))

! LaTeX Error: File `l3backend-pdfmode.def' not found.

Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: def)

Enter file name:

The file l3backend-pdfmode.def is not present. I am using the Debian packages of TexLive, which does now by default use some parts of l3backend:

ii  texlive-base   2020.20200925-1 all          TeX Live: Essential programs and files

Did somebody experience a similar problem? If this turns out not to be my fault, I will file a bug report, however, would be happy for a workaround solution.

15
  • Is l3backend package installed?
    – Tanvir
    Commented Oct 9, 2020 at 15:13
  • l3backend is by now part of texlive-latex-base. So, yes, it is installed. There is no extra package l3backend any more, as far as I could find out.
    – jbroedel
    Commented Oct 9, 2020 at 15:17
  • The MWE works in my machine with texlive 2020. Are you using two different versions of texlive ? The l3backend package is available on CTAN.
    – Tanvir
    Commented Oct 9, 2020 at 15:29
  • something got out of sync. You seem to have a new l3backend version (where pdfmode has been splitted into pdftex and luatex) and an older format/expl3 which still looks for pdfmode. Try to recreate the formats. Commented Oct 9, 2020 at 15:31
  • I recreatet the formats several times using Debians reconfigure mechanism. No improvement. I can see that I do have a newer version as the folder /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3backend does contain the two splitted .def files. I suppose Debian TexLive maintainers have packaged nonmatching versions - could this be the reason?
    – jbroedel
    Commented Oct 9, 2020 at 15:37

1 Answer 1

1

Now pdflatex from TexLive runs flawless with the Debian TexLive packages.

The problem was the (not systemwide) folder ~/texlive2020 containing an old .fmt file. Following the usual latex strategy, this would be used preferrably over the newly generated systemwide format files from installing a new TeXLive version. Why this version of pdflatex.fmt in a subfolder of my home folder has not been found by kpsewhich (see comments on my question) is not clear to me, but can for sure be explained.

Punchline: the old installation was not completely removed for all users, and interfered with the new (and fresh) installation.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .