2

For a document I am working on I frequently need to refer to the real line with positive infinity adjoined (but not negative infinity). I have been typesetting this as follows

\mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\}

enter image description here

This takes up a lot of horizontal space. Is there a way to get a smaller plus symbol? Or to cramp the symbols together a bit more? I just feel a bit bothered that, in the expressions where this space occurs, it doesn't really register visually as a discrete entity unto itself.

enter image description here

  • 1
    you could use {\cup} to lose the binop spacing but can't you define this to be R_\infinity or some such, and then just use the defined symbol? – David Carlisle Oct 17 '20 at 14:48
  • Welcome to tex.sx. I'm not competent to say what this change might imply to the meaning, but to set the \cup as an "ordinary " character, eliminating all space, wrap it in braces: {\cup}. – barbara beeton Oct 17 '20 at 14:48
  • Honestly it doesn't bother me. I'd use larger parentheses \bigl(...\bigr). You can lose the spacing around \cup by enclosing it in braces {\cup}. – campa Oct 17 '20 at 14:49
  • @DavidCarlisle: Thanks! I thought about using something like R_infinity, but felt it should really be R_{+infinity} to avoid confusion with the one point compactification, and the latter looked too clunky for me. Anyway your other suggestions here and in your answer below are very helpful, so thanks! – Michael Oct 17 '20 at 14:58
2

Personally I think I'd use the form you show, but if using it a lot make it a defined term such as R' then just use that defined notation.

But if you want to squeeze it, perhaps

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{amsmath,amsfonts,amssymb}

\begin{document}

\[C_0(\mathbb{R}{\scriptstyle \cup \{+ \infty\}}) \rtimes \mathbb{R}\]
\end{document}
  • Neat, I may use something like this! Thanks for indulging this rather frivolous question! :) – Michael Oct 17 '20 at 14:59
3

I'd go with a special symbol that conveys the idea:

\documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}

\DeclareRobustCommand{\upcomp}{{{-}\!\!{\bullet}}}
\DeclareRobustCommand{\downcomp}{{{\bullet}\!\!{-}}}

\newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\RRup}{\RR_{\upcomp}}
\newcommand{\RRdown}{\RR_{\downcomp}}

\begin{document}

We define $\RRup=\RR\cup\{+\infty\}$ and $\RRdown=\RR\cup\{-\infty\}$
with the topology induced by the usual extended real line.

Now we can use $C_0(\RRup)$ that takes less space.

\end{document}

enter image description here

Alternative with \mapsfromchar of stmaryrd:

\documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,stmaryrd}

\DeclareRobustCommand{\upcomp}{{-\mapsfromchar}}
\DeclareRobustCommand{\downcomp}{{\mapstochar-}}

\newcommand{\RR}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\RRup}{\RR_{\upcomp}}
\newcommand{\RRdown}{\RR_{\downcomp}}

\begin{document}

We define $\RRup=\RR\cup\{+\infty\}$ and $\RRdown=\RR\cup\{-\infty\}$
with the topology induced by the usual extended real line.

Now we can use $C_0(\RRup)$ that takes less space.

\end{document}

enter image description here

  • Well worth considering. Thanks! – Michael Oct 17 '20 at 15:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.