Do you know how LaTeX implements environments? To be more precise, what does
\newenvironment{<env-name>}[<n-args>][<default>]{<begin-code>}{<end-code>}
in terms of TeX commands (i.e., how is the LaTeX command \newenvironment
defined in TeX)?
The command \newenvironment{<env-name>}[<n-args>][<default>]{<begin-code>}{<end-code>}
is equivalent to:
\newcommand{\<env-name>}[<n-args>][<default>]{<begin-code>}
\newcommand{\end<env-name>}{<end-code>}
The reason is that \begin{<env-name>}...\end{<env-name>}
is transferred into
<check whether the command \<env-name> exists
\begingroup
\csname <env-name>\endcsname % this is a way to call macro \<env-name> by its name
...
<check whether the inner-most environment is really <env-name>
\csname end<env-name>\endcsname % calls \end<env-name>
\endgroup
The problem is that you cannot do \newcommand{\#1}...
so the command \csname...\endcsname
is actually used by \newenvironment
to overcome this problem.
The exact definition of \newenvironment
is very complicated since the presence of *
(that indicate the environment to be defined without \long
), presence of [<n-args>]
and [<default>]
has to be tested, which in the terms of LaTeX means a lot of inner macros. To explore the details, you can run the following short source code that shows the macro definitions:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\parindent0pt
\parskip2ex
\makeatletter
\ttfamily
\meaning\newenvironment % <-- put any macro name here
\par
\meaning\newcommand % <-- put any macro name here
\makeatother
\end{document}
\begin{X}
is expanded/executed strictly before \end{X}
, and in some special cases (verbatim
environment for example) \end{X}
is read as-is without any expansion, and the begin command (macro) uses it to delimit the end of the environment.
Commented
Nov 14, 2021 at 6:06
\begin
and\end
.