I am doing the scheme shown in the first image.
Second image shows the scheme done by the following code:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\begin{document}
\schemestart
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{C(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(=[6]O)}
\arrow(a--){->[$h\nu$]}
\chemleft[
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{C(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(=[6]O)}
\chemright]
\arrow(a--){->[RH]}
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{\charge{45=\.}{C}(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(-[6]OH)}
\arrow{0}[,0]
\+ \charge{45=\.}{R}
\arrow(@a.north east--){0}[,0] $*$
\schemestop
\end{document}
When I add the command \chemname in order to add "initiating radical" to the last product (third image), the plus sign and the R radical moves up. I'd like to keep the + sign and the radical aligned with the arrow and the legend below the radical. I'd also like to add a wider gap between the + and the R radical. Any suggestions?
This is my current code:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\begin{document}
\schemestart
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{C(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(=[6]O)}
\arrow(a--){->[$h\nu$]}
\chemleft[
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{C(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(=[6]O)}
\chemright]
\arrow(a--){->[RH]}
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{\charge{45=\.}{C}(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(-[6]OH)}
\arrow{0}[,0]
\+ \charge{45=\.}{R}
\arrow(@a.north east--){0}[,0] $*$
\schemestop
\\
\schemestart
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{C(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(=[6]O)}
\arrow(a--){->[$h\nu$]}
\chemleft[
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{C(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(=[6]O)}
\chemright]
\arrow(a--){->[RH]}
\chemfig[atom sep=1.6em]{\charge{45=\.}{C}(-(*6(=-=-=-)))(-[4](*6(-=-=-=)))(-[6]OH)}
\arrow{0}[,0]
\+ \chemname{\charge{45=\.}{R}}{initiating\\radical}
\arrow(@a.north east--){0}[,0] $*$
\schemestop
\end{document}