1

I am using

    \begin{equation}
        equation
    \end{equation} 

in order to write formulas

but for example with

\begin{equation}
G(\boldsymbol{x_1}, \overline{z} -dz/2; \boldsymbol{x_2}, \overline{z} +dz/2) = {\displaystyle\int }  \frac{d^2 \boldsymbol Q}{{2 \pi}} [\widetilde{C_0}(\boldsymbol{Q}) e^{-i Q^2 dz/2k}] e^{i \boldsymbol{Q} \cdot (\boldsymbol{x_2}-\boldsymbol{x_1})} \times  \notag\\ {\displaystyle\int }  \frac{d^2 \boldsymbol q}{{2 \pi}} [\widetilde{I_0}(\boldsymbol{q}) e^{-i q^2 dz/8k}] e^{i \boldsymbol{q} \cdot [\boldsymbol{x_2}+\boldsymbol{x_1}]/2} e^{-i \boldsymbol{Q}\cdot \boldsymbol{q}(\overline z /k)}
\end{equation}

I obtain

enter image description here

How can I correct it?

1
  • It is just too wide. Use e.g. multline and add some line breaks.
    – user238301
    Mar 27 '21 at 17:21
0

You can't break lines with \\ inside equation; you need a specific alignment environment, in this case split.

The terms at which it's possible to split are very long, so I suggest to set the left-hand side on a line by itself and indenting the right-hand side split into two lines.

enter image description here

The code:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,bm}

\newcommand{\vect}[1]{\boldsymbol{#1}}

\begin{document}

\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
& G(\vect{x}_1, \bar{z} -dz/2; \vect{x}_2, \bar{z} +dz/2)
\\
&\qquad = \int \frac{d^2 \vect Q}{2 \pi}
               [\tilde{C}_0(\vect{Q}) e^{-i Q^2 dz/2k}]
               e^{i \vect{Q} \cdot (\vect{x}_2-\vect{x}_1)}
\\
&\qquad \times \int \frac{d^2 \vect{q}}{2 \pi}
                    [\tilde{I}_0(\vect{q}) e^{-i q^2 dz/8k}]
                    e^{i \vect{q} \cdot [\vect{x}_2+\vect{x}_1]/2}
                    e^{-i \vect{Q}\cdot \vect{q}(\bar{z}/k)}
\end{split}
\end{equation}

\end{document}

I have also other suggestions:

  1. \boldsymbol{x_1} should be \boldsymbol{x}_1
  2. It's better to have a more semantic command, so I defined \vect to use \boldsymbol
  3. {\displaystyle\int} is wrong: just use \int.
  4. Instead of \overline it's better to use \bar over single symbols.
  5. Similarly for \widetilde, which need not cover the subscript, and can well be \tilde; don't worry: your readers will see it.
1

As I said, the equation is just too long. You can either use multline or align with \MoveEqLeft from mathtools. I am also a bit unsure of the notation, the d in dz is not meant to be a differential, is it? In any case, it is very helpful if the reader knows what is meant, and clearly mark differentials. Likewise, you want to have the imaginary i and the Euler e distinguishable from indices and variables. Given that I do not know the context one guess for the equation could be:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\newcommand{\diff}{\mathop{}\!\mathrm{d}}
\begin{document}
\begin{align}
 \MoveEqLeft
G(\boldsymbol{x}_1, \overline{z} -dz/2; \boldsymbol{x_2}, \overline{z} +dz/2) 
= \int\!  \frac{\diff^2 \boldsymbol Q}{{2 \pi}} \,
\bigl[\widetilde{C_0}(\boldsymbol{Q})\, \mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i} Q^2 dz/2k}\bigr]\, 
\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} \boldsymbol{Q} \cdot 
(\boldsymbol{x}_2-\boldsymbol{x}_1)}   \notag\\ 
&{}\times\int   \!\frac{\diff^2 \boldsymbol q}{{2 \pi}} \,
\bigl[\widetilde{I_0}(\boldsymbol{q})\, 
\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i} q^2 dz/8k}\bigr]\, 
\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} \boldsymbol{q} \cdot 
[\boldsymbol{x}_2+\boldsymbol{x}_1]/2}\, 
\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i} \boldsymbol{Q}\cdot \boldsymbol{q}(\overline z /k)}
\;.
\end{align}
\end{document}

enter image description here

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.