I would like to have a custom union symbol \ccup that is essentially two unions placed one inside another. A rotated \Subset works just fine for a "small" union, as shown in the image below; however, I need to have a similar symbol \bigccup for a "big" union just like \bigcup.

Rescaling \Subset does not look good at all for big unions. How could I make the symbol I need from scratch? Ideally, it should have the same dimensions as the original \bigcup.

enter image description here

  • I would be inclined to compose it from a \big up and a \cup, although the fact that this symbol does not otherwise exist would give me pause.
    – Don Hosek
    Jul 19, 2021 at 5:20
  • Please give a minimal working example and post your \ccup code.
    – M. Logic
    Jul 19, 2021 at 7:49
  • 1
    Isn't \Cup from the amssymb-package what you are looking for, at least for the "small" symbol? I used detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html to search for such a symbol. Jul 19, 2021 at 8:08
  • @Οὖτις Ah, yes indeed. I did not realize there was such a symbol already implemented in amssymb! However, there doesn't seem to be a "big" version.
    – Castor
    Jul 19, 2021 at 23:23

2 Answers 2


Here an idea similar to Οὖτις's answer but trying to improve spacing. The trouble is that simply scaling \Cup does not work well, because the glyph sticks outside of its bounding box if compared to \bigcup:

\fboxrule.1pt \fboxsep-\fboxrule
\fbox{$\Cup$} \fbox{$\displaystyle\bigcup$}

enter image description here

For the scaling to work properly (and to obtain decently placed limits) we must first add some vertical padding.







D: $\displaystyle\bigcup_a^b c \qquad \displaystyle\bigCup_a^b c$\par\medskip
T: $\bigcup_a^b c \qquad \bigCup_a^b c$\par\medskip
S: $\scriptstyle\bigcup_a^b c \qquad \bigCup_a^b c$\par\medskip
SS: $\scriptscriptstyle\bigcup_a^b c \qquad \bigCup_a^b c$


enter image description here

Short comments:

  • One could try making the new symbol thinner but that starts deforming lines a wee bit too much for my taste.
  • The \slimits@ comes from amsmath and is used by all sum-like big operators. It will obey the sumlimits/nosumlimits package options.

Based on this I propose the following as a starting point.

enter image description here

You can see that the linewidth of \bigCup is too much and it does not perfectly meet \bigcup's height, but right now I don't know how to fix that.


   This is inline: $A\Cup B$
      \bigCup_{i=1}^\infty A_i% your symbol
      \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty A_i% normal \bigcup

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .