5

What is this? I'm just trying to write '

Entry:

Enter image description here

Output:

Enter image description here

My code:

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[margin=1.5cm]{geometry}
\usepackage{helvet}
\renewcommand\familydefault{\sfdefault}
\usepackage{mathastext}
\usepackage[most]{tcolorbox}
\usepackage{pgfplots,relsize}
\usepgfplotslibrary{fillbetween}

\def\h {1.3ex} % cup and cap height
\def\w {1.2ex} % cup and cap width
\def\lw{0.12ex} % cup and cap line width
\def\sp{0.7269ex} % space before and after
\newcommand{\mysymbol}[1]
{
  \hspace{\sp}
  \tikz[line width=\lw,line cap=round,rotate=#1,baseline=-0.4ex]   {\draw (-0.5*\w,0.5*\h) -- (-0.5*\w,0.5*\w-0.5*\h) arc (-180:0:0.5*\w) -- (0.5*\w,0.5*\h);}
  \hspace{\sp}
}
\newcommand{\mycup}{\mysymbol{0}}
\newcommand{\mycap}{\mysymbol{180}}
\newcommand{\mysub}{\mysymbol{270}}
\newcommand{\mysup}{\mysymbol{-360}}

\begin{document}

        \begin{align*}
        p' \wedge q
        \end{align*}

\end{document}
9
  • 4
    Can you give a bit of context, i.e., the code of the document that shows this behavior? It is definitely not normal, \documentclass{article} \begin{document} $\wedge(q' \wedge r)$ \end{document} compiles without problems.
    – Marijn
    Sep 19 at 18:56
  • 2
    Please show the couple of lines of code -- preferably the code itself, not a screen shot of code -- that precede the one you've chosen to show.
    – Mico
    Sep 19 at 18:56
  • 6
    Don't ever redefine \sp -- or, for that matter, \sb -- unless you want to come to grief. (Hint: \sp and \sp are short for superscript and subscript.)
    – Mico
    Sep 19 at 19:34
  • 7
    Basically the problem is using \def (which is not LaTeX) - using \newcommandwould have triggered a redefinition error. It's a good habit to use it especially for short macro names, where clashes are more probable.
    – Rmano
    Sep 19 at 20:25
  • 3
    You've already received an answer, but here's a good tip* for troubleshooting: look at what is bring printed and compare it with your preamble definitions. "0.7269ex" is a slightly random thing to be bring printed. You should then check your definitions---which, as others have said, should use \newcommand not \def---to see if this appears anywhere. This method doesn't find the culprit every time, and it certainly doesn't give the full answer given below, but it can help diagnose the issue. [*I feel that it's a good tip; it works well for me, at least!]
    – Sam OT
    Sep 20 at 8:25
8

The problem is occurs with the package mathastext and your definition of \sp. It seems like mathastext uses \sp in its definition of ':

\def\mst@active@math@prime{\sp\bgroup\mskip\mst@prime@muskip\prim@s}

(taken from here, page 55, line 215). You can fix the problem by calling the macro something else.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.