Using biblatex+biber, and any of the "verbose" styles, it seems that maxcitenames
has no effect. What I would like to achieve is to have citations using \textcite
appear with a small number of maxnames, but have the full author list in the corresponding footnote.
Currently I use the following options:
\usepackage[backend=biber,
maxcitenames=2,
maxbibnames=20,
style=verbose-note
]{biblatex}
Let's cite \textcite{A} here.
I thought this should generate something like the following:
Let's cite Author et al.^1 here.
^1 Author A, Author B, and Author C "Paper title". In Journal, Year.
But instead I get this, as if I had the same large number for both maxcitenames
and maxbibnames
. Is there a good workaround?
Let's cite Author A, Author B, and Author C^1 here.
^1 Author A, Author B, and Author C "Paper title". In Journal, Year.
MWE:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{filecontents}{test-example.bib}
@article{a,
author = {A, Author and B, Author and C, Author},
title = {Paper title},
journal = {Journal A},
year = {1921},
}
\end{filecontents}
\usepackage[backend=biber,
maxcitenames=2,
maxbibnames=20,
style=verbose-note
]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{test-example.bib}
\begin{document}
Let's cite \textcite{a} here.
\end{document}
verbose-note.cbx
for an easy solution but could not find any with my limited knowledge. For clarity,maxbibnames
only applies to the bibliography, the footnotes are actually\footcite
and thusmaxcitenames
applies to them hence why they print similar numbers. Hope someone more experienced can assist, I think the solution will come from redefiningtextcite:count
or\cbx@textcite@init
.