I have been using biber/biblatex for a while now and I was used to define multiple citations with defbibentryset and the subentry option for biblatex. This worked nice but since the last update I have a problem with how references are ordered. For example if I define 3 \defbibenetryset they are numbered from 1 to 3 in the bibliography no matter if there are other single citations between them. In order to check this problem I compiled again an old file that worked, but it is not working any more:

\documentclass[a4paper, 10pt]{article} %environnement du document
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} %prise en charge des caractères spéciaux
\usepackage[frenchb]{babel} %langue
\usepackage{csquotes} %pour la biblio
\usepackage[backend=biber,style=chem-acs,subentry,maxnames=20]{biblatex} %style acs

%pour réussir à faire des notes de bas de page



         {\BibliographyWarning{Ignoring prenote argument}}%
      {\BibliographyWarning{Ignoring postnote argument}}}






a\superfullcite{hov} \\
a\superfullcite{Grela2002} \\


the output should be ref1, ref2, ref3, ref4, ref5 in the bibliography, but it gives ref1, ref3, ref4, ref2, ref5. The set=hov is numbered 2!!!


  • 1
    This could be a bug, I'm looking into it – PLK Jul 24 '12 at 8:51
  • 1
    It was a bug. Please update to the biber 1.1 development beta on SourceForge and try it again. – PLK Jul 24 '12 at 11:07

I suppose this should be an answer ... this was a bug in biber 1.0 which should be fixed in 1.1 which is in beta on SourceForge.

  • Is this possibly an issue with biber 2.2? I had to add an explicit \nocite{} in addition to the \defbibentryset{} recently to get the sorting working again. – mforbes Nov 3 '15 at 4:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.