2

I have been using the Garamond font for almost 10 years and now I decided to change, to try something new, and after having spent some hours in reading and looking for TeX Fonts, I came up with the decision that to me another great and good looking font is given by

\usepackage{newpxtext} 
\usepackage[euler-digits]{eulervm}

Yet when I was going to compile a token-document, some warnings appeared. Nothing strange, just the fact that the following string was not recognized

m\in\mathbb{R} \qquad \mathbb{1}

The output document did contain all what I wrote except for the \mathbb part.

Now I ask: is there a way to fix this, to get \mathbb letters (as well as the "identity" operator, 1, in \mathbb)?

To give you an example, here is what Garamond font would output, VS those new fonts.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Thank you so much!

2
  • Note 1, it's recommended to provide a full MWE.
    – user202729
    Jul 14, 2022 at 9:42
  • @user202729 Uhm, in what sense? Shall I add the code?
    – Henry
    Jul 14, 2022 at 9:48

1 Answer 1

2

You need to declare a \mathbb alphabet, which eulervm doesn't provide.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{newtxtext}
\usepackage[euler-digits]{eulervm}
\usepackage[bb=stixtwo]{mathalpha}

\begin{document}

\[
m\in\mathbb{R}\qquad\mathbb{1}
\]
Some text in between with math $m\in\mathbb{R}$ to see
whether $a+b$ combines well.
\[
\int_{\Omega} \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}
\frac{\ell \vec{v}}{r^2}\,d\hat{x}\,\nabla\phi+\psi\Theta\,\partial f
\]

\end{document}

enter image description here

I'm not sure I'd use Times together with Euler, however.

2
  • Do you have any advice about what font/package to use? Euler sounded good to me, but if you have any suggestion I will take them as gold!
    – Henry
    Jul 14, 2022 at 9:54
  • @Henry I'd go with newtxmath. But it's a question of personal taste.
    – egreg
    Jul 14, 2022 at 9:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .