Does anyone have a syntax pattern for TeXworks’s syntax-patterns.txt that will correctly highlight Expl3 code? I.e., something that will recognize that the entirety of \cs_new:Npn is a command sequence—although highlighting the :Npn suffix differently might not be a bad idea.


I use a colour scheme based loosely on that from WinEdt's DTX submode (I used to use WinEdt). This is for editing .dtx files, and nowadays includes support for l3docstrip's @@ convention:


# comments
red        Y    \^\^A.*

# Guards
orange         N    %<(?:[A-Za-z0-9!\|]+|.)>
limegreen      N    %<\*(?:[A-Za-z0-9!\|]+|.)>
crimson        N    %</(?:[A-Za-z0-9!\|]+|.)>
darkviolet     N    %<@@=(?:[A-Za-z]+|.)>

# special characters
darkred        N    \^\^\^\^\^[0-9a-z]{5}
darkred        N    \^\^\^\^[0-9a-z]{4}
darkred        N    \^\^\^[0-9a-z]{3}
darkred        N    \^\^[0-9a-z]{2}
darkred        N    [$#^_{}&]
gray        N    ^%%.*
gray        N    ^%

# Macrocode
green        N    \\(?:begin|end)\{macrocode\}

# LaTeX environments
darkgreen    N    \\(?:begin|end)\s*\{[^}]*\}

# control sequences
blue        N    \\(?:[A-Za-z@:_]+|.)

The key line here is the last one, which does the highlighting request. Of course, this is just a case of getting the regular expression right (if only this were easy!).

  • I’d been using a version of this (without the @@-highlighting) based on an earlier answer of yours, and didn’t realize it already covered expl3. Thank you! Aug 5 '12 at 4:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.