Using wrapfigure in the main text and just after that in a footnote, then the quote environment behave strangely: too narrow or shifted away.


Removing one of the "wrapfigure" then one gets the usual quote. So it seems that the wrapfigure changes some lengths. Any idea?

  • 1
    as documented: "You must not specify a wrapfigure in any type of list environment or or immediately before or immediately after one.", and quote is a list environment. Jan 19, 2023 at 12:23
  • I have seen this in the documentation of wrapfigure. But In my case you can add any amount of text, even new sections ... after the footnote, but nothing changes. I made all kind of tests. Jan 19, 2023 at 17:02
  • Hm. I will look later, I never dared to put a wrapfig in a footnote (and I never put so much text in a footnote that I actually had to consider the use of wrapfig there). Jan 19, 2023 at 17:27
  • You probably have never been working with historians. In their research most of the relevant material is in footnotes. And I could not convince them to use endnotes which would simplify a lot the presentation. If you have time have a look at eterna.unibas.ch/index.php/publbez/index Jan 19, 2023 at 20:46
  • you have two wrapfigures in the same paragraph (as the footnote starts at the end of the one with the main wrapfig. If I move the footnote the quote behaves again. Jan 21, 2023 at 0:15


You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .