I want to add DOIs to my paper, using \usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}. In my thesis, this worked fine, with no issues. Now I'm using the Taylor & Francis template found here, but using apacite. Why wouldn't the DOI's then still appear, as in the thesis?
MWE below, *not minimal, but I'm worried something in the packages is causing the problem?
\documentclass[]{interact}
\usepackage[natbibapa]{apacite}% Citation support using natbib.sty
\bibpunct[, ]{(}{)}{;}{a}{}{,}% Citation support using natbib.sty
\usepackage{epigraph}
\usepackage[hidelinks]{hyperref}
%\usepackage[toc,page]{appendix}
\usepackage[usenames,dvipsnames,table]{xcolor}
\usepackage{float}
% To add pdf pages
\usepackage{pdfpages}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{xfp}
% Load packages to allow in- and output of non-ASCII characters.
\usepackage{lmodern} % Use an extension of the original Computer Modern font to minimize the use of bitmapped letters.
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % Determines font encoding of the output. Font packages have to be included before this line.
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % Determines encoding of the input. All input files have to use UTF8 encoding.
\usepackage{graphicx}
% Extended LaTeX functionality is enables by including packages with \usepackage{...}.
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{amsmath} % Extended typesetting of mathematical expression.
\usepackage{amssymb} % Provides a multitude of mathematical symbols.
\usepackage{mathtools} % Further extensions of mathematical typesetting.
\usepackage{microtype} % Small-scale typographic enhancements.
\usepackage[inline]{enumitem} % User control over the layout of lists (itemize, enumerate, description).
\usepackage{multirow} % Allows table elements to span several rows.
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{booktabs} % Improves the typesettings of tables.
\AtBeginDocument{
\renewcommand{\BBAB}{and}
\renewcommand{\APACrefYearMonthDay}[3]{\BBOP{#1}\BBCP}
}
\usepackage[font=it]{subcaption} % Allows the use of subfigures and enables their referencing.
\usepackage[ruled,linesnumbered,algochapter]{algorithm2e} % Enables the writing of pseudo code.
% Allows the definition and use of colors. This package has to be included before tikz.
\usepackage{nag} % Issues warnings when best practices in writing LaTeX documents are violated.
\usepackage[color=lightgray]{todonotes} % Provides tooltip-like todo notes.
% For rotating figures, tables, etc.
% including their captions
\usepackage{rotating}
\usepackage{pdflscape}
\usepackage{hyperref} % Enables cross linking in the electronic document version. This package has to be included second to last.
\usepackage[acronym,toc]{glossaries} % Enables the generation of glossaries and lists fo acronyms. This package has to be included last.
\theoremstyle{plain}% Theorem-like structures provided by amsthm.sty
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}
\newtheorem{notation}{Notation}
\begin{document}
\section{Introduction}
Hello \citep{gartneretal2011}.
\bibliographystyle{apacite}
\bibliography{export}
\end{document}
But then my output is this: 
I've seen posts that suggest putting the dois in notes. Is this the answer? I have about 150 references, so that's a nightmare. Why in the world can a citation package not handle a doi? I'm relatively new to LaTeX and this seems like a major downfall. Although it worked in my thesis document, so why not here?
My bibliography does have doi as a field. Thank you :D
It had to do with the weird doc class I was using. I switched it to \documentclass[]{article} and it printed the DOIs. Who knows?
