8

I've recently switched to XeTeX. In my document I use this code to set the fonts:

\usepackage[math-style=ISO,bold-style=ISO]{unicode-math}
\usepackage{xunicode}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}
\setmainfont{Linux Libertine O}
\setsansfont{Linux Biolinum O}
\setmonofont{Inconsolata}
\setmathfont{XITS Math}

I installed Libertine and biolinium from the ubuntu repositories and I downloaded XITS and installed in my .fonts directory... Now I'd like to know what are the main differences between my approach and using the real latex packages (like libertineotf.)

3
  • 1
    Why don't you use the mono font from Libertine?
    – user2478
    Aug 30, 2012 at 16:12
  • The idea came from here, but actually I don't use mono fonts that much Aug 31, 2012 at 19:58
  • I guess using the package is seen as a simpler straightforward solution for some users, but, de facto, using one or the other of these won't change the final result.
    – user18489
    Sep 8, 2012 at 3:05

1 Answer 1

4

Local fonts reduce the portability of the source code

compiling on computers without access to those fonts.

This should not effect any output files, to the final viewing.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .