Correct spacing around environments without the comment symbol when using parskip?

Question

I prefer inserting blank lines between paragraphs, and no indenting. I know that the package parskip can offer this functionality, but it comes with a catch. When writing

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{parskip}

\begin{document}
  This is a block of text of paragraph 1.

  \begin{equation}
    a + b = c
  \end{equation}

  This is a continuation of paragraph 1.

\end{document}

Using an environment between paragraphs is interpreted as a paragraph of its own, and hence it adds additional blank lines around the environment. To make it one paragraph block a comment symbol can be applied:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{parskip}
\begin{document}

  This is a block of text of paragraph 1.
  %
  \begin{equation}
    a + b = c
  \end{equation}
  %
  This is a continuation of paragraph 1.

\end{document}

This solves my typesetting problem, but it creates a different problem for me. I use Vim to edit my .tex files. By using the comment symbol Vim will see the entire block (pre-equation, equation, post-equation) as a single paragraph (a Vim text object). Text objects can be used to move around and do edits. For example, I can skip easily towards the text before the environment, the environment itself and the text after the environment when they are separated by white lines. It is also easy to comment, delete or change entire (Vim) paragraphs with a few key strokes. I lose these editing capabilities when I have to include the comment symbol, because then Vim sees the text before the environment, the environment itself and the text after the environment as one paragraph.

In short: I want LaTeX to see the three-part block as one paragraph to prevent it from adding extra blank lines, but I want to actually keep blank lines between the three parts in the .tex file for ease of editing reasons.

My question therefore is this: can I get the typesetting that results from the second piece of code without having to include the comment symbols, thus allowing me to navigate my files easily by using vim's paragraph text object?

Answer 1

This is a correct behaviour and can be hardly changed. It is correct because sometimes the equation starts or ends a paragraph and sometimes not, and you need to distinguish it easily.

If you are concerned with having the code well-organized, I recommend to indent all displayed maths by a tab or at least 4 spaces to make it distinguishible, like in the following. It will obviously not solve your VIm issue, see my comment to the question.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{parskip}
\begin{document}

Pellentesque elementum tincidunt viverra. Quisque nec eros sed
lorem tempor convallis sed non nisl. Suspendisse mattis, nisl
eget iaculis ullamcorper, tortor purus cursus ante, non sagittis
erat leo nec ante. Aliquam ac leo sem, vel iaculis lacus.
Phasellus feugiat vehicula nibh, in iaculis mauris mattis id.
Integer diam arcu, cursus ut rutrum quis, laoreet et quam. Cum
sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes,
nascetur ridiculus mus.
    \begin{equation}
        a + b = c
    \end{equation}
Integer metus lectus, volutpat vitae blandit in, ornare eu
nulla. Suspendisse potenti. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in
faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae;
Phasellus et malesuada arcu. Maecenas ornare porta sagittis.
Quisque vel ipsum velit, id vehicula ante. Aliquam eget risus
lorem, a sollicitudin nulla. Sed quis eros ac ante dapibus
luctus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Nam nec tempor nibh.
Quisque porttitor velit vel tortor semper eleifend.

\end{document}

Answer 2

The parameters controlling the amount of space above and below display math are \abovedisplayskip and \belowdisplayskip. To set them you can add

\AtBeginDocument{
  \setlength{\abovedisplayskip}{0pt plus 6pt minus 0pt}
  \setlength{\belowdisplayskip}{0pt plus 6pt minus 0pt}
}

to your preamble.

It seems to me that the values above should provide some reasonable spacing when one uses the parskip style. However, it produces very cramped results when there are no empty lines above and below.

It seems to me that the issue should be addressed at the editor level (vim) and not at the typesetting level (TeX and friends)