7

I posted an answer on math.se here and in there I used double dollar mode. Now in that mode, I had

\bigwedge^ \hspace{1mm} k V

but upon rendering it looks weird like

enter image description here

How can I bring the k closer to the big wedge so that it looks more normal like in single dollar mode? In single dollar mode, we have $\bigwedge^k V$ looking a lot more natural.

9
  • Does this concern a document printed with TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt or just MathJax?
    – egreg
    Commented Oct 12, 2012 at 22:45
  • @egreg I am not sure, on math.se it is printed with MathJax but when I type up latex documents I get the same problem too, so it's probably a latex wide problem. Commented Oct 12, 2012 at 22:46
  • You should never use $$ in LaTeX; probably \[\bigwedge\nolimits^{\!k}V\] is what you're looking for.
    – egreg
    Commented Oct 12, 2012 at 22:48
  • 1
    Recall that MathJax (used in Math.SE) is not LaTeX, while it uses some of its conventions.
    – egreg
    Commented Oct 12, 2012 at 22:53
  • 2
    @BenjaLim: See Why is \[ … \] preferable to $$?
    – Werner
    Commented Oct 12, 2012 at 22:59

2 Answers 2

10

Choose one among the following inputs, in LaTeX:

\[
\bigwedge^k V
\]

\[
\bigwedge\nolimits^k V
\]

\[
\bigwedge\nolimits^{\!k} V
\]

The respective results are shown below

enter image description here

The first is widely used, the second appears faulty. The command \! inserts a small backspacing.

Why not using $$ in LaTeX is explained here: Why is \[ ... \] preferable to $$ ... $$?

3

did you try the following?

\newcommand{\mybigwedge}[1]{\bigwedge^{\kern{-3pt}#1}}

(where the -3 can be fine tuned to your taste)

1
  • I get error "illegal unit of measure (pt inserted)"
    – Mathy
    Commented Mar 11, 2021 at 14:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .