47

If so, how? Do I need any additional software?

44

I'd instead use LilyPond, which, though not based on TeX at all, has similar goals of human-readable plain-text source files and beautiful, customizable output.

  • 1
    Actually, Lilypond was originally based on TeX, at least partly, but now it's not the case any more. – Arthur Reutenauer Aug 3 '10 at 7:32
  • @Arthur: that's news to me. (Seriously. The last time I used Lilypond was close to 6 years ago, and back then it was based on TeX. I wonder what made them switch.) – Willie Wong Aug 3 '10 at 10:07
  • Now it's mostly written in C++ with a Scheme interface to control many aspects of the typesetting process. There also are bits and pieces in Python. – Arthur Reutenauer Aug 3 '10 at 16:11
19

There's also MusiXTeX for the actual typesetting (CTAN). A bit of searching turned up this page about exporting from LilyPond to MusiXTeX.

  • 3
    Hi! The link to "this page" looks obsolete. – MattAllegro Dec 8 '15 at 16:25
18

In addition to MusiXTeX, there's also GregorioTeX for gregorian chant. It's apparently very well suited to typesetting this particular type of scores, and is actively maintained.

15

Lilypond provides a tool called lilypond-book for creating LaTeX documents with embedded music pieces inside. The embedding works via images, and baselines are not considered. So if you want to display a clef in the middle of a line, it will only be nicely aligned vertically with the rest of the line after you have tweaked its vertical position using additional LaTeX code.

If you don't want to create a document, but rather music sheets on their own, Lilypond wins hands down in user friendliness. I am considered quite unanimously as a TeX wizard and would no longer think of using the TeX-based approaches for typesetting music.

With regard to its implementation: I think Lilypond has always been C++, has gained some Scheme innards rather early, but used TeX as its typesetting backend internally for quite a long time. However, its current mode of operation is to write PostScript files directly as main output (PDF generation works internally by using Ghostscript on those). As a result, utf-8 characters work rather transparently if the font has them. TeX's track record in that area, in comparison, is less than fabulous although in the last years, a few TeX engines (XeTeX, LuaTeX) that can work with larger character sets than 8bit have been developed.

13

I'd go for Lilypond, myself (see Ben Alpert's answer), but note that there's a TeX FAQ page of discussion about the alternatives

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.