What's a "fancy" f
I can use to denote a Fourier transform?
(I mean something fancier than what \mathcal{F}
provides.)
(Added as answer by request of the OP)
One way to get a fancier F
than \mathcal
provides is to use the \mathscr
command provided by the mathrsfs
package:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathrsfs,amsmath} %The amsmath package is included for \xrightarrow
\begin{document}
\[\delta(t) \xrightarrow{\mathscr{F}} 1\]
\end{document}
gives
To compare other fancy F
s: \mathfrak{F}
from the amssymb
package gives
\mathcal
gives
I found \mathfrak{F}
looks decent.
-
3
-
@egreg: I got it from here: texify.com/img/%5CLARGE%5C%21%5Cmathfrak%20F.gif – user541686 Dec 8 '12 at 10:07
-
3
-
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. – Masroor Jun 16 '14 at 2:39
-
1@mma I am not very glad with the short answer as well, but look at the edit history. It didn't bother anybody for 1.5 years. – Johannes_B Jun 16 '14 at 6:39
F
than\mathcal
provides is to use the\mathscr
command provided by themathrsfs
package. – Charles Staats Dec 8 '12 at 4:57mathfrak
!) Please post it as an answer! :) – user541686 Dec 8 '12 at 5:05