2

In variational calculus, the first variation is written as \delta F for some functional F. Vectors are often typeset with boldface, i.e. \vec{x} becomes \mathbf{x}. If I want to typeset the first variation of a vector, would I make the Delta bold as well?

I.e, which is "correct"? \delta \mathbf{x} or \mathbf{\delta x}?

Edit: The functional itself is scalar, but some constituents may not be. Functionals

2
  • But a vector is not a functional no? Then it needs \delta F[\mathbf{x}]. Or are you considering a scalar product?
    – percusse
    Jan 5 '13 at 13:43
  • 3
    It seems to have nothing to do with (La)TeX. Jan 5 '13 at 15:08
3

I believe the former to be the correct way. In essence you'd make the \delta a vector itself by typesetting it in bold face, which is clearly wrong. The variation constitutes more of an operator than a vector, in a similar vein with the integral or a differential for example, neither of which should be bold faced, regardless of the type of integrand. The better question in my eyes is, should you format it upright, cf. here

1
  • Good point with the upright issue.
    – Psirus
    Jan 5 '13 at 13:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.