113

In order to save space, I would like to condense the bibliography, specifically, reduce the amount of vertical space between entries. Currently, it seems there is double-space between consecutive entries.

I use the "article" layout in LyX.

3

2 Answers 2

131

As Andrew says, you can use natbib and then reset \bibsep:

\setlength{\bibsep}{0pt plus 0.3ex}

Without natbib, you can set \parskip and \itemsep to zero (they are responsible for the vertical space). It is advised to add some glue-stretch that can be used if necessary (this is what plus 0.3ex is for).

\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\usepackage{lipsum}

% ADD THE FOLLOWING COUPLE LINES INTO YOUR PREAMBLE
\let\OLDthebibliography\thebibliography
\renewcommand\thebibliography[1]{
  \OLDthebibliography{#1}
  \setlength{\parskip}{0pt}
  \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt plus 0.3ex}
}

\begin{document}

\begin{thebibliography}{99}

\bibitem{a} \lipsum[1]

\bibitem{b} \lipsum[4]

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}
1
  • 2
    This did not do anything for me. I added the lines you described, to my pre-amble. I'm trying to make the space between bibliography entries larger. May 23, 2018 at 3:27
11

For those who are using BibTeX but cannot use the natbib package (thus no \bibsep), and has tried varous \renewcommand on \thebibliography and \itemsep (source), here is what I found that actually works in this scenario (source):

\let\oldthebibliography\thebibliography
\let\endoldthebibliography\endthebibliography
\renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]{
  \begin{oldthebibliography}{#1}
    \setlength{\itemsep}{0em}
    \setlength{\parskip}{0em}
}
{
  \end{oldthebibliography}
}
3
  • 5
    Isn't this exactly what yo' already did in the accepted answer?
    – TeXnician
    Jun 4, 2017 at 15:54
  • @TeXnician No, this one is renewenvironment instead of renewcommand. Cann't remember if this made a difference though.
    – Hai Zhang
    Jun 4, 2017 at 16:09
  • 5
    This makes no difference as an environment x defines a macro \x and a \endx. That's why your solution is even more complicated than the accepted one (since you also redefine \endthebibliography).
    – TeXnician
    Jun 4, 2017 at 16:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.