What's the correct way to comment out sections of explanatory text (included for humans to read) in a .bib file? I would like biber/biblatex to simply ignore this text.

When I put in text like


I get warnings like

WARN - BibTeX subsystem: /tmp/8XsEEmjVOo/bib-latest.bib_14175.utf8, line 7, warning: 139 characters of junk seen at toplevel

3 Answers 3


Anything that is not inside a recognized entry is a comment. So just type along! Any .bib interpreter that complains about it is buggy, as it is not following the rules laid down in btxdoc. However, you can use an entry like @COMMENT, which will hopefully not trigger any complains.

  • 1
    See addition to question.
    – graffe
    Jan 15, 2013 at 20:25
  • So Biber does not discard this stuff, whereas BibTeX does, whereas Biber respects %, whereas BibTeX does not?
    – cfr
    Feb 2, 2018 at 23:10
  • @cfr I think you are correct. a bit messy really. but personally I prefer biber's behaviour as it is basically what you would expect from a tex file and more flexible.
    – ArTourter
    May 10, 2018 at 12:13
  • @ArTourter But it still spews warnings about it all, which TeX wouldn't. It's a comment - why does Biber tell me it's junk?
    – cfr
    May 22, 2018 at 1:01
  • @cfr, what do you mean? Are you saying that biber is spewing warnings when you use the % comment syntax or the @COMMENT one? It doesn't say anything for me about the % and I used these things all over the place.
    – ArTourter
    May 24, 2018 at 19:52

At least with biber, you should be able to use the same commenting method as with LaTeX, that is using % for the commented line.

After a few test comments can be outside entries, within entries (commenting a whole line) or commenting the end of a line.

    author = {Onymous, A. N.}, %The author
    % the title of the article
    title = {A Nice title},

Should work as expected. However this may not be the case with bibtex.

  • 8
    Re: "However this may not be the case with bibtex". Indeed, this does not seem to work with bibtex. I have an entry in my .bib file with a line like author = {Onymous, A. N.}, %The author in it. In TeXShop, when I hit the Typeset button with BibTex selected in the drop down next to it, I get a message in the console saying "You're missing a field name" and "I'm skipping whatever remains of this entry". The rest of my entry was indeed ignored and I got an incomplete reference in my .pdf. Jan 28, 2016 at 11:44
  • @JacobAkkerboom no but the question was about biber/biblatex. I never claimed that this solution would work with bibtex.
    – ArTourter
    Jan 28, 2016 at 19:29
  • yes, you are right. I felt it was worth investigating, but now that I realise the question is probably about alternatives to bibtex, I realise my comment is probably not so useful. I'm quite a novice at these things, do you think mine is a case of a buggy .bib interpreter, as the other answer suggests? Thanks for your reply. Jan 28, 2016 at 19:43

I had difficulties commenting out entries in a .bib file (as opposed to adding free-standing comments). Posts to date on this thread did not address this particular problem.

I'm using Overleaf). What I observed:

  • bibtex looks for entries (@blah) before it checks if the line starts with a % (or so I figured).
  • but only that line gets processed; if you commented out the entire entry the rest of it (title=, etc) is ignored and you end up with errors ('missing field') attributable to @blah


This doesn't work:

% ...
% }

This works (replace the @):

% ...
% }

I poked around in Overleaf and found this explanation (note that mine, above, is a bit different):

% is actually not a comment character in .bib files! So, inserting a % in .bib files not only fails to comment out the line, it also causes some BibTEX errors. To get BibTEX to ignore a particular field we just need to rename the field to something that BibTEX doesn’t recognise. For example, if you want to keep a date field around but prefer that it’s ignored (perhaps because you want BibTEX to use the year field instead) write Tdate = {...} or the more human-readable IGNOREdate = {...}.

To get BibTEX to ignore an entire entry you can remove the @ before the entry type. A valid reference entry always starts with a @ followed by the entry type; without the @ character BibTEX skips the lines until it encounters another @.

bibtex is very focused on @; biber apparently respects %s (but you'd have to use biblatex). See pointers provided by moewe (in the comments) for other discussion.

  • 1
    Note that there is a difference in behaviour between Biber (btparse) and BibTeX. See for example tex.stackexchange.com/q/261261/35864, tex.stackexchange.com/q/325696/35864.
    – moewe
    May 25, 2019 at 5:15
  • Thank you Kurt & moewe. I looked into things a bit more carefully and amended the post. When you search for a particular problem you typically get a bunch of hits. If you're lucky you click on the right one. Sometimes you don't. May 25, 2019 at 21:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.