I have a GrayBox environment defined as follows.

It is used \begin{GrayBox}...\end{GrayBox} or \begin{GrayBox}[\textwidth]...\end{GrayBox}, that is, it can pass optional parameter to the environment.

I guess #1 is the setup for default value, and #2 is for setup for the value given.


How is #2 possible? I mean, is it LaTeX's rule that if #1 is not given, the default value in [] is used instead? Is there any reference about this? Is the same technique can be applied to \newcommand?

\newenvironment{GrayBox}[1][\dimexpr\textwidth-4.5ex]% **** #1
   {\setlength{\RoundedBoxWidth}{\dimexpr#1} **** #2
   {   \end{minipage}
       \draw node[draw=black,fill=black!10,rounded corners,%
             inner sep=2ex,text width=\RoundedBoxWidth]%
  • Why is there a ??? in the question, BTW? Was it intentional or some Unicode char that got corrupted? – ShreevatsaR Aug 4 '10 at 4:24
  • @ShreevatsaR : Just a mark to ask some question. – prosseek Aug 4 '10 at 4:30
  • BTW: you might want to add a \relax after the expression evaluated by \dimexpr just to be on the safe side, even if it's not strictly necessary here. – cgnieder Dec 24 '12 at 11:13

It is LaTeX's rule that if the optional argument is not present, then #1 takes on the default value. That is,

\newenvironment{hello}[1][world]{\noindent Hello #1, }{Bye now!\\}
    nice to meet you.
    glad you could make it.

will produce

Hello world, nice to meet you. Bye now!
Hello Bob, glad you could make it. Bye now!

as its output. The same is true for commands defined with optional parameters, as in

\newcommand{\hi}[1][world!]{\noindent Hello #1}
  \hi \\

which results in the output

Hello world!
Hello Bob

| improve this answer | |
  • Your example mixes environments and commands! Whilst environments are just fancy commands, would it be okay to edit it (either you or I) in to two examples: one an environment (with \begin{hello} ... \end{hello} and one a command? – Andrew Stacey Aug 4 '10 at 7:48
  • Oh wow, can't believe I did that! Thanks for pointing it out Andrew, hopefully this version is a little more suitable. – Michael Underwood Aug 4 '10 at 17:43
  • Yup, looks fine now. – Andrew Stacey Aug 4 '10 at 17:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.