2
votes
Accepted
Formatting LaTEX equations
None of the 18 [!] packages that are loaded in the OP's code are needed to typeset the equations. Worse, some of those packages are mutually incompatible, such as the cite and natbib packages. The ...
2
votes
Formatting LaTEX equations
Your document produces
! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text>
$
l.37 ...erbrace{\eta_{NLoS}}_{\textrm{{\eta}{\xi}}
}
?
(no pdf ...
1
vote
Does this alignment of the equations look weird?
You shouldn't use \text, but \mathrm. Why? Try
\begin{theorem}
Here $\text{e}^2$ will be in italics
\end{theorem}
(this assumes you have such a \newtheorem defined).
Of course I'd never use \mathrm{e}...
1
vote
Why does \\ not return a new line in an equation?
Old topic, but without really satisfactory answers, in my opinion.
I'd go with multline, which has been introduced exactly for cases such as the present one. On the other hand, also split may be ...
1
vote
Making equations copyable in pdf
Using https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/621117/250119, it's possible to redefine various commands in order to make the copypaste work automatically.
Adapted a bit from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/...
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
equations × 6021align × 1077
math-mode × 883
amsmath × 666
numbering × 503
horizontal-alignment × 421
spacing × 326
cross-referencing × 264
formatting × 193
vertical-alignment × 156
labels × 151
split × 146
beamer × 139
line-breaking × 135
subequations × 133
tables × 132
matrices × 125
alignment × 123
cases × 114
errors × 108
brackets × 102
arrays × 101
environments × 96
tikz-pgf × 94
symbols × 94