7

You should not leave a blank line between \end{equation} and \begin{conditions} or the description might be detached from the equation. Nor you should have a blank line before \begin{equation} under any circumstance. On the other hand, such a long description of variables is quite likely to produce bad page breaks, be it detached or not from the equation. ...


4

I have added some examples - they are not perfect but a start. % Based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/34452 and https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/35717 % Remark: Please compile at least 2 times (otherwise the arrow position may be wrong). \documentclass{article} %\usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{tikz} %\usetikzlibrary{calc} \newcommand{\...


3

A short code with pstricks: each value is made an \rnode, and these nodes are linked by a node connection with the relevant shape (\ncarc) with a label above: \documentclass[svgnames]{article} \usepackage{nccmath} \usepackage{pst-node} \begin{document} \[ f(0) = \rnode{1}{1},\; f(1)= \rnode{2}{3},\; f(2)= \rnode{3}{5},\; f(3)= \rnode{4}{7} \psset{...


3

With the help of two minipages: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \noindent \begin{minipage}{0.5\textwidth} \begin{equation} \label{eq:va} \begin{aligned} \textbf{v}_a = \begin{pmatrix} {\alpha_1} \\ {\alpha_2} \\ {\vdots} \\ {\alpha_{T-1}} \\ {\alpha_T} \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned} \end{equation} \...


3

You are supposed to end the box with \tikzmarkend. In your example the fill is only roughly what it should be because you have the large dimensions in (10.8,-1.8)(0,0.7). The second box comes from the second \tikzmarkin. If you use \tikzmarkend instead, you do no longer need add the large dimensions by hand. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \...


3

There is an indent on the line where the conditions environment begins. In your example, the conditions environment is defined as \newenvironment{conditions}[1][where:] {% #1\tabularx{\textwidth-\widthof{#1}}[t]{ >{$}l<{$} @{${}={}$} X@{} }% } {\endtabularx\\[\belowdisplayskip]} So when the conditions environment is called with the ...


2

I propose 1. to use the various matrix environments,; 2. to use the medsize environment from nccmath for the exponent (it is ~80 % of \displaystyle): \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath, nccmath} \begin{document} \begin{equation} \begin{bmatrix}\bigl(\gamma\bigr) - {\Bigl(\dfrac{\alpha}{\beta}\Bigr)}^{\begin{medsize}\begin{pmatrix}\dfrac{\...


2

The problem you were having with split is that you cannot have a line break between a matching { and }, or between \left and \right. I rewrote your equation slightly so that the parentheses spanning the line break set an explicit size instead of \left and \right, and removed the unnecessary braces around the expression to be integrated. I also removed most ...


2

I think you need only one column of & alignment points. Observe the use of explicit parenthesis-sizing instructions and of \mleft and \mright in lieu of \left and \right; they serve mainly to conserve on horizontal whitespace. \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,mleftright,derivative} \begin{document} \begin{align} [u_t]: \quad \...


2

I add my answer using the enviroment cases instead of systeme package with the simple common package amsmath. \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \begin{itemize} \item $\mathrel{\mkern-15mu}\begin{cases} 3 - 4x > 5&\\ 6 + 9x \leq 1 \end{cases}$ \item $\mathrel{\mkern-15mu}\begin{cases} 3x -6 > 2x&\\ ...


2

Reducing the left margin in the \tcolorbox, some spacing adjustments, and a medium sized formula; is it better? \documentclass{beamer} \mode<presentation> { % \usetheme{default} % or try Darmstadt, Madrid, Warsaw, ... % \usecolortheme{default} % or try albatross, beaver, crane, ... % \usefonttheme{default} % or try serif, structurebold, ... \...


2

As this example shows you should use a multi-line display such as gather and never one display math following another or at the start of a paragraph. \documentclass{article} \showoutput \showboxdepth=3 \begin{document} \noindent These equations have inconsistent spacing if this line ``pushes down the first.'' \[a\] \[a\] \[a\] \noindent These have ...


2

You were almost there! All you need to change is to replace the display-math setting with an inline-math setting, i.e., replace the \[ ... \] wrapper with $ ... $. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{systeme} \begin{document} \begin{itemize} \item $\systeme*{3 - 4x > 5,6 + 9x \leq 1}$ \item $\systeme*{3x -6 > 2x,2x - 6 > 5x}$ \end{itemize} \end{...


1

Here are two solutions for horizontally and vertically centred systems: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[svgnames]{xcolor} \usepackage{mathtools} \usepackage{systeme} \usepackage{showframe} \renewcommand{\ShowFrameLinethickness}{0.2pt} \begin{document} \mbox{} \begin{itemize} \item \makebox[\linewidth]{$ \systeme*{3 - 4x > 5,6 + 9x \leq 1} $} \...


1

I just added \unvovers, \setbeamercovered{transparent} and replaced \stackrel by overset to obtain \documentclass{beamer} \mode<presentation> { % \usetheme{default} % or try Darmstadt, Madrid, Warsaw, ... % \usecolortheme{default} % or try albatross, beaver, crane, ... % \usefonttheme{default} % or try serif, structurebold, ... \...


1

Depending what you want to get automatized, you could create a new command. I would suggest something like: \newcommand\equationlist[2]{ % Params are the equation and the label \begin{equation} #1 \label{eqn:#2} \end{equation} where: \begin{itemize}[labelindent=20pt,leftmargin=*,widest=$M_x$,align=left,itemsep=0pt] ...


1

@scottkosty mentions 2 relevant bug reports 1 and 2, and the latter suggested passing in "reqno" as a document class option. This changes the equation labeling to the right side (instead of the left as shown) and avoids overlapping the equation label with the equation. Since I'm OK with right side equation label, this solves the issue for me.


1

The automatic equation splitting mechanism are not perfect according to what I know, so I'd do it manually. Also, since you have a variable d in your equation, you have even more reasons to typeset differential d's upright. I would not overdo it with \left and \right. Since you do not provide us with a complete document, I had to guess, and hope that the ...


1

Some further web-search gave me the answer. 1 ) Remove \break 2 ) Add \noindent before the first equation Correct code: \begin{multicols}{2} \noindent \begin{equation} \label{eq:va} \begin{aligned} \textbf{v}_a = \begin{pmatrix} {\alpha_1} \\ {\alpha_2} \\ {\vdots} \\ {\alpha_{T-1}} \\ {\alpha_T} \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned} \end{equation} \begin{...


1

Something like this? Employ \usetagform{indented} to switch to the alternative tag format, \mytag{...} to generate the alternative tag, and \usetagform{default} to switch back to the default tag format. \documentclass[a4paper,12pt,numbers=noenddot]{scrartcl} \usepackage{mathtools} % for '\newtagform' and '\usetagform' macros \newtagform{indented}{}{\hspace*...


1

If you really need this you can add the space to the command that sets the tag: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} zzz \begin{equation} 1=0 \end{equation} \makeatletter \def\tagform@#1{\maketag@@@{(\ignorespaces#1\unskip\@@italiccorr)\hspace{1cm}}} \makeatother zzz \begin{equation} 1=0 \end{equation} \end{document} Or ...


1

You can still set the equation using IEEEeqnarray with only 2 columns, positioning the - and + via a left overlap: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{IEEEtrantools,mathtools} \begin{document} \begin{IEEEeqnarray}{rl} \phi(x, y, z) = \frac{V}{2\pi}\Biggl( \arctan &\Biggl[\frac{(x_2 - x) (z_2 - z)}{y\,\sqrt{y^2 + (x_2 - x)^2 + (z_2 - z)^2}}\...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible