# Tag Info

0

It looks like you're using an align environment, or maybe an aligned environment, but failed to provide alignment points (& characters). Moreover, you may have meant to create 2 separate columns of material, with expressions involving (x-x_0) on the left and those involving (x_0) on the right. In the following, the material within each column is aligned ...

2

If each and every item in a numbered list consists of exactly one displayed equation (possibly covering two or more lines), I believe it's dubious typographic practice to mark the equations with both an item number and an equation number. Choose one marking system or the other, but not both. Pointless redundancy should be avoided at (nearly) all cost, ...

3

I see no need for the & symbol before \forall i,j,t in the second row. A \quad or \qquad spacing directive should suffice. I would use an aligned environment inside an equation environment; this setup generates a single equation number, with the optional argument of aligned ([t] or [b] indicating whether the equation number should be placed at the top ...

1

From your sketch I assume that you only want long equations to go into the margins. You can easily widen the line at the appropriate equations using changepage's adjustwidth: \documentclass{scrbook} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage[includemp, showframe, paperwidth=18.90cm, paperheight=24.58cm, top=2.170cm, ...

2

Reducing the left margin in the \tcolorbox, some spacing adjustments, and a medium sized formula; is it better? \documentclass{beamer} \mode<presentation> { % \usetheme{default} % or try Darmstadt, Madrid, Warsaw, ... % \usecolortheme{default} % or try albatross, beaver, crane, ... % \usefonttheme{default} % or try serif, structurebold, ... \...

2

As this example shows you should use a multi-line display such as gather and never one display math following another or at the start of a paragraph. \documentclass{article} \showoutput \showboxdepth=3 \begin{document} \noindent These equations have inconsistent spacing if this line pushes down the first.'' $a$ $a$ $a$ \noindent These have ...

3

You were almost there! All you need to change is to replace the display-math setting with an inline-math setting, i.e., replace the $...$ wrapper with $...$. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{systeme} \begin{document} \begin{itemize} \item $\systeme*{3 - 4x > 5,6 + 9x \leq 1}$ \item $\systeme*{3x -6 > 2x,2x - 6 > 5x}$ \end{itemize} \end{...

2

Here are two solutions for horizontally and vertically centred systems: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[svgnames]{xcolor} \usepackage{mathtools} \usepackage{systeme} \usepackage{showframe} \renewcommand{\ShowFrameLinethickness}{0.2pt} \begin{document} \mbox{} \begin{itemize} \item \makebox[\linewidth]{$\systeme*{3 - 4x > 5,6 + 9x \leq 1}$} \...

2


3

You can make a one column table (for the rules) and fill the contents manually. \documentclass[]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[french]{babel} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,bm} % bm after amsmath \usepackage{booktabs} % bold in math mode \newcommand{\matr}[1]{\bm{#1}} % Plücker transforms \DeclareMathOperator{\rx}{rx} \DeclareMathOperator{\ry}...

1


0

Here's a self-answer - I'm not sure why I didn't think of it, but you can just fake the tags using align*. The right-hand tags don't line up with the tags from normal equations, but I find that not so bad. Of course, I'm very open to better suggestions, especially since someone else want to do the same thing but using the automatic equation numbers instead ...

0

This answer is WRONG. Refer to comments made by @egerg below. According to nccmath: fleqn numbering, nccmath should be loaded after hyperref. It seems that, in this case, amsmath should be loaded after hyperref as well. This means move any packages that implicitly load amsmath after hyperref. Here is the adjusted (partial) order: \usepackage{amssymb} % .....

1

Invert your use of equation and fleqn. That is, use If $\epsilon \ll 1$, $$\begin{fleqn} \Gamma(1 + \epsilon) = 1 - \gamma\epsilon + O(\epsilon^2) \label{app:eq_gamma-exp} \end{fleqn}$$

4

The basic problem here was that amsmath was trying to set your equation tags in the default language, Arabic. Mixing Latin characters with Arabic script confused the bidirectional algorithm. If your Arabic font does not support parentheses in Arabic script, the only error you will get is a silent warning message buried in your log file. This is an ...

2

You can use matrices to access the expressions in the equation, and place some {} at the right places after & just like in ordinary arrays of the same purpose. calc can be used for the relative alignment. I didn't know if you want to have all the nodes terminate at the same horizontal positions, so I added both options. \documentclass{article} \...

1

Some comments and suggestions: First and foremost, change $-$ to just -. Be careful where you place the \hat accents. Please check if it should ro and \theta o or, rather, r_0 and \theta_0. I suggest you use \displaystyle in both the main numerator and main denominator and increase the "fence" sizes from \big to \bigg. \documentclass{article} \usepackage[...

4

I would use a single align* for this. This will ensure alignment at all the = signs. Only label has to be entered manually. \documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{enumerate} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \begin{document} \begin{align*} (t=1)\quad w^{(1)} &= (w_1^{(1)},w_2^{(1)},w_3^{(1)}) = (1,1,1)\\ (t=2)\quad w^{(2)} &= (w_1^{(2)},...

3

As a complement to Werner's fine answer, I propose a few refinements: \documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{enumitem} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{showframe} \begin{document} \begin{enumerate}[label={($t=\arabic*)$},itemsep=0pt,leftmargin=*,align=left] \everymath{\displaystyle}% local setting \item \$w^{(1)}_{\vphantom{1}} = (...

Top 50 recent answers are included