Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange

New answers tagged

1

Two things: You should load hyperef as the last package The code you are using is a modification of the subequations code from amsmath.sty, so you also need a mimic the code hyperef has specific to subequations \documentclass{article} \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsthm} \usepackage[linktoc=page,...


1

This seems quite like the original: \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage[textwidth=275pt]{geometry} \usepackage{microtype} \usepackage{enumitem} \newlist{thminner}{enumerate}{1} \setlist[thminner]{ label=(\arabic*), ref=\arabic*, leftmargin=3em, labelwidth=*, topsep=\smallskipamount, partopsep=0pt, itemsep=0pt, align=left, resume, ...


3

I suggest using instead a custom enumerate-like environment. It uses a very simple code with enumitem: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{enumitem} \newlist{myprop}{enumerate}{1}% \setlist[myprop]{label =(\arabic*), resume, wide=0pt, leftmargin=*} \usepackage{lipsum} \begin{document} \begin{myprop} \item Necessarily if there is life on the Evening ...


0

The required theorem style is predefined: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage[spanish]{babel} \usepackage{amsthm} \newtheorem{theorem}{Teorema}[section] \newtheorem{pro}[theorem]{Proposición} \newtheorem{cor}{Corolario}[theorem] \newtheorem{lem}[theorem]{Lema} \theoremstyle{definition} \newtheorem{defin}[theorem]{Definición} \...


2

\documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsthm} \usepackage{lipsum} \newtheoremstyle{mythm}{3pt}{3pt}{}{}{\itshape}{:}{.5em}{} \theoremstyle{mythm} \newtheorem{mytheorem}{Theorem} \begin{document} \begin{mytheorem} \lipsum[1] \end{mytheorem} \end{document}


1

Since this is getting a bit extensive for the comments, here's an answer. Firstly, let me stress that only clear syntax is good syntax. Syntax that looks like one thing but does something else entirely is just confusing. One of the strengths of (good) LaTeX is that syntax always reflects meaning; \emph emphasizes text (no matter what this means ...


Top 50 recent answers are included