New answers tagged

3

This shows how to put an entire tikzpicture into a node. Not sure how to put that node into a tree. \documentclass[12pt, letterpaper, oneside]{article} \usepackage{tikz} \begin{document} \begin{center} \sbox0{\begin{tikzpicture}[nodes={draw, circle, fill=gray!20}] \node{19} child {node{25} child[missing] ...


3

When something is a tree, use forest. :) Oval styles from Excelsior's answer. Edge label code from here. Reading your question carefully, it seems that the tree that you produced in GraphViz is not actually how you want the tree to look. If that's the case, here's a more regular version of the tree without the crossed branch and misplaced C3R4 node. \...


3

My approach using tikz \documentclass[border=5pt]{standalone} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{calc,fit,shapes,backgrounds} \usepackage{makecell} \tikzset{% every node/.style={font=\small}, } \tikzstyle{arrowline}=[-latex, shorten >=2pt, shorten <=2pt] \tikzstyle{elor}=[ellipse, minimum width=20pt, minimum height=10pt, fill=orange!50!red!50!...


1

Just add ,name=foo into your node brackets. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usepackage{amsmath} \usetikzlibrary{automata} \usetikzlibrary{calc,arrows.meta,positioning} \newcommand{\iddots}{\reflectbox{$\ddots$}} \usepackage{forest} \usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta} \begin{document} \begin{forest} for tree={ % nodes circle, draw, ...


2

For whatever reason, setting label in the every node/.style does not work, however, creating a new node style does seem to. The following code produces the desired results: \documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{tikz} \tikzset{dyck/.style={ draw, circle, label={left:(}, label={right:)}, } } \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[sibling ...


2

Drawing your tree with use of the forest package (which is dedicated for drawing trees), the code for tree become simpler and much shorter. Edit: Considering OP request in comment, that some edges should have dash pattern. \documentclass[border=3.141592]{standalone} %\documentclass{article} \usepackage{forest} \usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta} \begin{document} ...


2

The problem here is that your node distance is always the same, hence the overlap. I suggest you create your tree by using child nodes and set the sibbling distance for each level. That way you take control of your nodes positions. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[% ...


1

You have a blank line between your b node and your c node, which confused the parser. Removing that makes the tree you want. But you may want to consider using forest for trees instead, as the input syntax (a labelled bracketing) is much simpler. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{tikz} \usetikzlibrary{graphs,graphdrawing} \usegdlibrary{trees} \usepackage{...


5

Here's something you can start with. \documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone} \usetikzlibrary{trees,decorations.pathreplacing,calligraphy,fit,backgrounds} \begin{document} \begin{tikzpicture}[ state/.style={ rectangle, rounded corners=8pt, minimum height=1cm, draw=black, minimum width=1cm, }, ...


3

I'm adding this answer even if it does not address OP's main issue (starting the branch below the connective), because (i) it provides a solution for the same problem (logic parse trees) and (ii) I had it already developed for myself. \documentclass{article} \usepackage{forest} \forestset{ declare toks={left}{}, declare toks={right}{}, declare ...


2

I am not an expert on forest, but what about smashing the size of part of the equations with mathtools? Like: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{forest} \usepackage{mathtools} \forestset{ parse tree/.style={for tree={s sep=3em, minimum size=1.5em}} } \begin{document} \begin{center} \begin{forest} parse tree [$\neg\mathrlap{(\neg P \...


Top 50 recent answers are included